@lumi There are people/creatures/entities working on various parts of it. I think it'd be cool if they're able to pull off key transparency from the start rather than trying to bolt it on later
@ity@lumi oh I don't care for his dramatic "analyses" on messengers but as far as I can tell his other work is good, and I like the idea of key transparency. I'm also sympathetic to his cause of getting furries to stop using telegram.
I'd say someone that says complete bullshit in his dramatic blogposts and outright lies, makes shit up, or says outright wrong stuff that he should know better if he has any idea what he's doing, tells me that, well, either he has absolutely no idea what he's doing and sucks this bad, or is being malicious and hoping nobody notices he's making shit up
If he wants to be dramatic, at least do it the way Bernstein did it; don't make basic mistakes in cryptography and cybersec, just conveniently omit information.
@walnut@lumi (for context, I had to deal with the FUD he spread about Matrix because I was one of the community Matrix devs working on Matrix security. The funniest thing, Matrix is insecure as fuck. So there's no reason to make shit up as FUD. One can just... Talk about the actual security issues. But yk... For that he would need to actually be good at cybersec. But instead he made shit up. I wonder why )